Justice Diana Insanally yesterday granted an Order Nisi, demanding that the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) show cause why the decision to sack magistrate Omeyana Hamilton, should not be reversed. The matter is returnable before the Judge on April 7.The magistrate received her dismissal letter almost two weeks ago.On Tuesday,Angel Di Maria Jersey, the magistrate through her lawyer Nigel Hughes filed an appeal against the JSC, indicating to the body the rules of 2010.The appeal means that the action which is taken against Hamilton is deemed quashed until the appeal is heard.Meanwhile this newspaper was told that the magistrate returned to the office of the Chancellor Carl Singh (Ag) seeking an audience with him.However his secretary, Mrs Chandra Jagnandan, informed the magistrate that she was no longer a member of staff.Jagnandan is not the most requisite person to give that kind of directive, legal sources explained.Later on,NBA Jerseys Outlet Shop, this publication was told that Senior Counsel Ashton Chase presented a letter to the magistrate, stating that the rules of the JSC were not enforced.The magistrate showed up for work on Wednesday and reported to the Chief Magistrate Priya Beharry.Kaieteur News learnt that the Chief Magistrate instructed Hamilton to go the Chancellor.Upon arriving at the Chancellor’s office, his secretary informed the magistrate that he was not well and did not report to work. The magistrate on Friday last,Cheap Jerseys Store, filed writs of Certiorari and Mandamus before Justice Insanally,Wholesale Nike NFL Jerseys, claiming that she was not afforded due process or a fair hearing when she met with Chancellor Carl Singh (ag) and Mr. Ganga Persaud. Hamilton was sacked with immediate effect last Tuesday.In her affidavit of support, Hamilton said that she met with the two members of the Judicial Service Commission, after a complaint was made by Acting Chief Magistrate Priya Beharry.Hamilton said that she believes that the Chancellor should not have been at the meeting, when considering the complaint of the Chief Magistrate, since “he had previously heard and determined my request not to travel to Bartica by speedboat.”Further, in the affidavit,Cheap Jerseys, she stated that the Chancellor’s direction to magistrate Hamilton, to travel by speedboat even after he was informed about her medical issues,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, had placed himself in the position of the complainant and would not have properly sat to commence an investigation into the complaint of the Chief Magistrate.By doing that Hamilton said that the Chancellor’s presence could have injected the proceedings with bias therefore infringing her right to a fair hearing.It was cited that the Judicial Service Commission acted ultra vires and in breach of the rules of natural justice when they purported to embark on the hearing of the Chief Magistrate.Magistrate Hamilton, prior to her appointment, had served in the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. She also worked in the Magistrates’ Court and with Legal Aid.