標題: Cheap Jerseys From China
無頭像
HesezXD7
大天使
Rank: 2Rank: 2

積分 3255
帖子 1273
威望值 0 ♪
天使币 3819 枚
贡献值 0 ☆
爱心值 0 ♡
活跃度 3819 ☼
註冊 2018-7-5
用戶註冊天數 2093
用戶失蹤天數 1851
狀態 離線
發表於 2018-10-7 17:33 
36.57.176.245
分享  私人訊息  頂部
There has been a significant outcry in relation to a piece of legislation that was approved enshrining the ‘Benefits and Other Facilities’ due to former Presidents.Former President Bharrat Jagdeo had assented to the legislation when it was approved in the National Assembly during the course of the Ninth Parliament but the Opposition, which has a majority in this Tenth Parliament, had wanted it reversed.The Opposition complained about the inability to properly quantify the amounts payable to former Presidents under the legislation. However, Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh,Cheap Baseball Jerseys, says that the legislation only enshrined in law benefits that were made available on a discretionary basis in the past.Attorney General, Anil NandlallThe Opposition has already triggered a move to have the package reviewed in Parliament with a view to having the legislation amended.Should this move by the Opposition prove to be successful,NFL Jerseys Supply, Attorney General,Cheap Hockey Jerseys, Anil Nandlall contends that none of the former President’s currently enjoying benefits under the arrangements would be affected.These benefits cannot be reversed,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, argues Nandlall. He insists that laws made,Cheap Jerseys From China, are not retroactive.Nandlall, in a brief interview with this publication yesterday, reminded that legislation in particular that deals with property and property interest such “as a pension cannot operate by law retrospectively,” in a manner that would adversely affect the person enjoying such a benefit.He explained that such a move would affect vested fundamental rights that are protected by the Constitution of Guyana.“It can have no retroactive and retrospective effect and therefore cannot affect in any manner form or fashion the pension for any former president.”Asked specifically about the “benefits and other facilities” enjoyed by a former President, Nandlall said “in my view it is indivisible.”He explained that “it is a package enjoyed by former Presidents and therefore one cannot sever it.”According to Nandlall, the Constitution speaks to the remuneration of the President as well as terms of service and “that is secured while he holds office…Article 222 is clear that you cannot change or alter to the disadvantage of the office holder any of those terms and conditions of service that he enjoys including his remuneration.”He said that in the case where such a President demits Office, the pension or a package “which he is to enjoy ex-post facto…then the same spirit and the same legal principal will apply and you cannot deny him that right or entitlement.”Former President,Wholesale Jerseys, Bharrat Jagdeo